Cristian Adam <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Phil Bouchard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 07/21/2017 02:10 AM, Lorn Potter wrote: >> >>> >>> On 21 Jul 2017, at 2:22 pm, Phil Bouchard <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> So I would like to know if Qt thinks what I am proposing (BB++ -> C++ -> >>>> WebAssembly) is a good plan. >>>> >>> >>> What does this have to do with Qt? >>> >> >> For a web engine I don't think it's possible to swap the Javascript engine >> entirely but it is possible to introduce the BB++ -> C++ -> WebAssembly >> sequence. >> >> For the QML / Javascript dual then it could be replaced by with the QML / >> BB++ dual and, which harness the power of C++14 and Root.Ptr and we can >> just let the compiler do the hard work. >> > > Does this mean that you can turn QML to C++ code and compile just C++ code? > If so, wouldn't this render Qt Quick Compiler > <http://doc.qt.io/QtQuickCompiler/> obsolete?
Yes basically on one hand but you will benefit from getting the garbage collector away on the other hand. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
