On Sunday, 23 July 2017 13:02:59 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote:
> On 07/23/2017 03:26 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
> > Please create a bug with a test case (simple enough that it can be run
> > standalone like mine below) where you see more details on the
> > performance problem you see, with information about your platform, and
> > full details about how you measured the results (if you did any such
> > measurements).
> 
> I will later this week because I need to focus on the parser tonight to
> fix the access operator (dot) with expressions and initializers.
> 
> But I don't understand why we have to debate that much switching a LADA
> for a Ferrari. BB++ is just 2 weeks old but it's already pretty dang
> powerful.

For two reasons:
 1) your analogy is not correct
 2) you're basing the entire case on an assumption that is not proven

You could be building a great new language. Or a house of cards.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to