On 07/23/2017 05:15 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Sunday, 23 July 2017 13:02:59 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote:
On 07/23/2017 03:26 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
Please create a bug with a test case (simple enough that it can be run
standalone like mine below) where you see more details on the
performance problem you see, with information about your platform, and
full details about how you measured the results (if you did any such
measurements).
I will later this week because I need to focus on the parser tonight to
fix the access operator (dot) with expressions and initializers.
But I don't understand why we have to debate that much switching a LADA
for a Ferrari. BB++ is just 2 weeks old but it's already pretty dang
powerful.
For two reasons:
1) your analogy is not correct
2) you're basing the entire case on an assumption that is not proven
You could be building a great new language. Or a house of cards.
It's based on the brand new C++14 standards so the roots are strong but
it removes its complexity as you can see in the generated C++ code.
Also Javascript is hopeless in regards to inheritance so I'm using C++
conventions there.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
