On Monday, 27 August 2018 16:50:43 PDT Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > That's right, it will allow less disk usage for sure. But I don't know up to > which point is a "nice to have" feature or something that would really > decrease disk usage.
Strictly speaking, it would be no worse. In the worst case scenario (single architecture), it would occupy exactly as much space as it does now. The question is whether it's worth to implement it. QML plugins usually aren't big. I expect the savings to be minimal. So we should implement this only if it isn't too difficult to do so. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
