On 31 Aug 2018, at 02:06, Chris Adams <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Eddy, I'm willing to be listed as the maintainer of QtFeedback for now. If it ever gets more development attention and released as a supported module then someone with more time to give should probably take over, but until then I'm more than happy to review any changes people might contribute for that module. Thanks Chris! Let’s add you for Qt Feedback then :) Cheers, Chris. On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 11:27 PM, Edward Welbourne <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I notice, as part of seeking folk to look at API reviews, that we have several modules with no Maintainer: qtandroidextras, qtgraphicaleffects, qtmacextras, qtquick1, qtquickcontrols, qtsvg, qtwinextras and (the one that brought this to my attention) qtxmlpatterns, according to [0]. * [0] https://wiki.qt.io/Maintainers The supported modules where we have no maintainer listed go to me for the API reviews. Cheers, Lars (There's also qtdoc, with no person as maintainer, but with "Norway" in the Country column, which I interpret as the doc-team here in Oslo; and there's qtfeedback, which is unsupported; two other unsupported modules do in fact have Maintainers.) If anyone out there feels an urge to volunteer to adopt one of these orphans, it'd be worth speaking up, Eddy. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
