Hi Eddy, If you guys think my competences fill the bill, I can take on the qtmacextras module maintenance.
Best regards Samuel > On 30 Aug 2018, at 15:27, Edward Welbourne <[email protected]> wrote: > > I notice, as part of seeking folk to look at API reviews, that we have > several modules with no Maintainer: qtandroidextras, qtgraphicaleffects, > qtmacextras, qtquick1, qtquickcontrols, qtsvg, qtwinextras and (the one > that brought this to my attention) qtxmlpatterns, according to [0]. > > * [0] https://wiki.qt.io/Maintainers > > (There's also qtdoc, with no person as maintainer, but with "Norway" in > the Country column, which I interpret as the doc-team here in Oslo; and > there's qtfeedback, which is unsupported; two other unsupported modules > do in fact have Maintainers.) > > If anyone out there feels an urge to volunteer to adopt one of these > orphans, it'd be worth speaking up, > > Eddy. > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
