> On 10 Feb 2020, at 13:44, Jani Heikkinen <jani.heikki...@qt.io> wrote: > > Hi all, > > It seems that there is still some work needed to finalize deprecations and > replacement for Qt 5.15 > > We had some discussion here in Qt Company and based on that I propose: > > - Let's put Alpha out after this header view feature is in.
HeaderView change merged this morning: https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtquickcontrols2/+/270170 so we should be good to go with the Alpha. Cheers, Volker > - Let's agree these deprecations can be done still even the FF is in effect. > But let's try to finalize deprecations and replacements as soon as possible. > Blocking Alpha until all these are in doesn't make sense at this point > anymore. > - Before Beta1 these deprecations needs approval of module maintainer > - And after Beta1 adding new deprecations needs Lars's approval > > That should bring us enough flexibility in this special situation without > compromising or risking the Qt 5.15 release schedule too much. > > br, > jani > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org> On Behalf Of >> Jani Heikkinen >> Sent: torstai 6. helmikuuta 2020 10.03 >> To: Mitch Curtis <mitch.cur...@qt.io>; Lars Knoll <lars.kn...@qt.io>; Yulong >> Bai <yulong....@qt.io> >> Cc: Qt development mailing list <firstname.lastname@example.org>; >> releas...@qt-project.org >> Subject: Re: [Development] [Releasing] HEADS-UP: Qt 5.15 Feature Freeze is >> in effect now >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Mitch Curtis <mitch.cur...@qt.io> >>> Sent: keskiviikko 5. helmikuuta 2020 15.40 >>> To: Jani Heikkinen <jani.heikki...@qt.io>; Lars Knoll >>> <lars.kn...@qt.io>; Yulong Bai <yulong....@qt.io> >>> Cc: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilshei...@qt.io>; Qt development >>> mailing list <email@example.com>; releas...@qt-project.org >>> Subject: RE: [Releasing] [Development] HEADS-UP: Qt 5.15 Feature >>> Freeze is in effect now >>> >>> >>> Hi Jani. >>> >>> - It's a vital part of creating a table in Qt Quick, and something >>> that is non- trivial for a good chunk of users to implement themselves. >>> - I think you and Lars have already said it's low risk, which is true. >>> - I don't think this counts as justification, but.. it's been in the >>> works for a while, and we really shouldn't delay it any longer. >>> - I'm also confident we will be ready to merge it today. >> >> Hi, >> >> Ok, nice to hear it won't take that long to get this in. And based on all >> discussion related to this & qt5.15 overall let's take this in Qt 5.15. >> >> We have other issues delaying alpha packages as well so this won't be only >> thing delaying it 😃 Let's try to finalize alpha content during this week & >> get >> Alpha out during next one >> >> Br, >> Jani >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Development mailing list >> Development@qt-project.org >> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development