On 21/05/2021 16:26, Aleix Pol wrote:
I'd say embracing matrix can only be a positive iteration for the Qt project. I've personally been in #qt-labs for about a year through our matrix servers and it has served its purpose.You are welcome to join KDE's matrix server and give it a go. If Qt decides to make this the default way to proceed, our sysadmins can help make sure the adequate bridges are in place for a painless transition. https://community.kde.org/Matrix
Timeout :) of course (...I hope...) anyone is free to use KDE's matrix and create Qt-specific channels in there.
But:1) that doesn't mean that KDE is *endorsing* the #qt- channels on its Matrix instance (for that, I'd expect an official KDE decision, nominating someone from Qt to take care after those channels, etc.etc.?)
2) That doesn't mean that the Qt Project is *endorsing* its presence on such channels (for that, we need a Qt Project decision, then a KDE decision, etc.etc.?)
3) That also doesn't mean that KDE's Matrix will be bridged to Libera.Chat's Qt channels instead of/as well as Freenode's (was such a decision already taken, or does it depend on the decision from this thread?)
Thanks, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
