On 07.05.2025 21:38, Liang Qi wrote:
On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 10:40, Oswald Buddenhagen
<oswald.buddenha...@gmx.de> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 10:33:27PM +0100, Arno Rehn wrote:
On 24.10.23 21:12, Arno Rehn wrote:
On 22.10.23 20:57, Andy Nichols wrote:
Ideally if QtGamepad is reintroduced in Qt6 it would be with some
flavor of these changes rather than just being a strait port form Qt 5.
Agreed. Maybe I'll just push my port to github then, renamed as
qtgamepad-legacy or so.
Pushed it here: https://github.com/pumphaus/qtgamepadlegacy
Renamed the whole thing to QtGamepadLegacy, so there should be no
compatibility issues with the "actual" QtGamepad when it is released.
from a qt project policy pov, nothing speaks against pushing it to the
main repo as 6.x-legacy-api or some such. this would give it broader
exposure, and it could get a proper review on gerrit.
There is not much activity since
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtgamepad/+/495313 , see
https://github.com/qt/qtgamepad/commits/dev/ .
+1 for pushing qtgamepadlegacy to 6.x-legacy-api, and it will get
broader exposure. Arno, thanks for your effort.
Cool, so just a new branch 6.x-legacy-api? Should the "x" follow Qt's
minor release, so we'll have 6.9-legacy-api, 6.10-legacy-api, etc pp?
I guess it'll need the occasional adjustment to changed CMake API, so a
completely static 6.x-legacy-api will likely not be possible.
Regards,
Arno
--
Arno Rehn
Principal Software Engineer
Tel +49 89 189 166 0
Fax +49 89 189 166 111
a.r...@menlosystems.com
www.menlosystems.com
Menlo Systems GmbH
Bunsenstrasse 5, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany
Amtsgericht München HRB 138145
Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Mei, Dr. Ronald Holzwarth
USt.-IdNr. DE217772017, St.-Nr. 14316170324
--
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
