> On 12 May 2025, at 10:31, Arno Rehn <a.r...@menlosystems.com> wrote: > > On 07.05.2025 21:38, Liang Qi wrote: >> >> +1 for pushing qtgamepadlegacy to 6.x-legacy-api, and it will get >> broader exposure. Arno, thanks for your effort. > > Cool, so just a new branch 6.x-legacy-api? Should the "x" follow Qt's minor > release, so we'll have 6.9-legacy-api, 6.10-legacy-api, etc pp?
Huh? We don’t have this as an established practice AFAIK. Is the goal to maintain these APIs for every single Qt version we release? Is the goal to also release these legacy APIs? -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
