-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 So, no one sees the sanity of having an identifier that 'travels' well [think http, think XML, think json...encoding] besides a human-readable pseudo-identifier [common practice] ? Despite the fact that the DeviceMap [OpenDDR] data itself already clearly shows signs of having bitten by that 'bug' [barnes & noble vs. barnes and noble] in *non*-key data...
I am baffled. esjr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT+4skAAoJEOxywXcFLKYc3ykH/0oXmlmrvh0nTGUgjUH8R9nh UHGVsuHDiU0DG2J9aoFW0a3WvJUKfeQWuKO4zaHzkegD1fbtBgOTYTX//kNa74RJ yMhyU2yc75ZnPUjUd7t3/wZwW1as74wTgDftOA72j+EyXR1dyZwssEw1K4kRnXI8 F/QJqe4QaR7dxvp5x2SpkuDJ4R9Ypohz5dNcNuI4ImkGtBQYlIe0K0JIMbBvpWq4 7dxYs+dBzM5F2ZM4hA2oGTGTg+/JsNP0vB8TWd5gxTwFzvz7kE3jip49qiRRVJlw ZSYW6KqmXEiqMNgmWkHvxo0BZceknwNZjrKtgdIOAoea0/2LJ4+eKcKPZn9vM7g= =muRs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
