Genericdesktop is the parent of desktopdevice, which is the legacy I'd for desktops.
<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: "eberhard speer jr." <[email protected]> </div><div>Date:09/08/2014 2:52 AM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> </div><div>Subject: Data 1.0.1 release </div><div> </div>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, having tested the data proposed for release [see previous] I see no major issues with the data once the minor corrections have been made. There is one question I have : I get the idea behind the new 'generics' -- I'm not sure I'm sure it's the best way, but I'm ok with it, however aren't these two the same ? New : desktopDevice, Properties : 11 New : genericDesktop, Properties : 11 esjr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUDVIaAAoJEOxywXcFLKYc36IH/0BVHx5FptSgQWrni/xMRILw FgJMCfIrJjyD8bCnY9dBO3wh9EbhRRYT8b6OSJMk0RDOpP/934Aj6b2Rqhjb2+E9 0Qtoqp5aGfK3nTnKSl5LXVZJQ3uxGI6utY/vnLO0XpJebUu8vhE8q2W0VzcrI9Qo GyUUe4JISpWUS6V/YP2IWL5laQw0Ic/XQZohjl3P+o5NeXG567u1+HnEn1MADIsT /xnIHbsUYlcLm/z+p3r4NJ126Ru2nJ+A0iXKGxFr/vj15vjTYXz/74yjLy/ayzQG UCDOSA+OFVVqqwIM+6zah7sx0p+4djYxoYS1f6S63o0ayIjt0QzrzEeOXoIIJ6o= =yz67 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
