Those are ids, not attributes... <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Werner Keil <[email protected]> </div><div>Date:09/08/2014 3:26 AM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: [email protected] </div><div>Subject: Re: Data 1.0.1 release </div><div> </div>Vocabulary does contain these two new attributes, so which test or place was still missing them?
Werner Am 08.09.2014 08:53 schrieb "eberhard speer jr." <[email protected]>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > having tested the data proposed for release [see previous] I see no > major issues with the data once the minor corrections have been made. > > There is one question I have : I get the idea behind the new > 'generics' -- I'm not sure I'm sure it's the best way, but I'm ok with > it, however aren't these two the same ? > > New : desktopDevice, Properties : 11 > New : genericDesktop, Properties : 11 > > esjr > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUDVIaAAoJEOxywXcFLKYc36IH/0BVHx5FptSgQWrni/xMRILw > FgJMCfIrJjyD8bCnY9dBO3wh9EbhRRYT8b6OSJMk0RDOpP/934Aj6b2Rqhjb2+E9 > 0Qtoqp5aGfK3nTnKSl5LXVZJQ3uxGI6utY/vnLO0XpJebUu8vhE8q2W0VzcrI9Qo > GyUUe4JISpWUS6V/YP2IWL5laQw0Ic/XQZohjl3P+o5NeXG567u1+HnEn1MADIsT > /xnIHbsUYlcLm/z+p3r4NJ126Ru2nJ+A0iXKGxFr/vj15vjTYXz/74yjLy/ayzQG > UCDOSA+OFVVqqwIM+6zah7sx0p+4djYxoYS1f6S63o0ayIjt0QzrzEeOXoIIJ6o= > =yz67 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
