hi, On Fr, 2016-10-14 at 09:08 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:19:28AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > given that xenial has the wrong e2fslibs, should we not refrain > > > > from > > > > having a deb at all and just point people to the snap instead, > > > > that > > > > will make sure that the right snapd and the right e2fslibs are > > > > always > > > > available to the tool. > > > > > > > > > We have a code path that works on Xenial. It just requires sudo > > > though. > > > > > I misremembered; we never released it to Xenial so we don't need to > > do that > > now. However, the code path is still useful for people running it > > from source > > on the LTS. > > We will also be consuming ubuntu-image internally as a .deb on top of > 16.04, > for image auto-builds in Launchpad. So we will want this in the > archive > regardless. > aha, does that mean you will backport e2fslibs to xenial as proper SRU ?
ciao
oli
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Devices mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.snapcraft.io/mailman/listinfo/devices
