On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 10:26 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > The OLPC interface might be of some use as a starting point, but would > > need some work. It is currently in use on AMD Geode, Via C7, and Intel > > Atom based systems, but, among other issues, it conflicts with the > > Physical Address Extension feature. > > > > It conflicts with at least PAE, PAT and x86-64. Since NX requires PAE, > it also conflicts with that. As such, I would think it would have to be > considered obsolete.
In any case, what is of interest to Sebastian here isn't the ABI for the client interface, but the properties to put in the /cpus/ nodes, so we could start with that... Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
