On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 13:07 -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > > The motivation for simple-bus comes from Linux, but its definition is > OS-neutral. It indicates that no special bus knowledge is required to > access the devices under it.
That's never 100% true. In the case of ISA it's even less true due to the difference between IO and Memory space. > I don't think it applies to ISA, though -- I/O space is special bus > knowledge, and the "ranges" looks weird for memory-space as well. Right. > If we're going to get rid of device_type here, it would be nice to > have some other way to indicate that this node follows the ISA > binding, without having to recognize an implementation-specific > compatible. The code in drivers/of/address.c uses the name property to match isa busses. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
