Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 23:47 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
That may not be wise. Your real bus heirarchy may not be architecturally
defined on some systems so you can't incorporate it into code, nor is it
necessarily a heirarchy - eg some of the Geodes.
Ok, so I'd suggest doing something like:
- pci is below the corresponding atom node
- isa is a child of pci
The later is a useful representation even if it doesn't correspond to
reality. From an address representation perspective, ISA can be
considered somewhat as a substractive decoding child of PCI (again even
if that's not 100% true), which simplifies the representation in the
device-tree a bit, and allows to still have things like VGA devices on
the PCI segment that decode IO ports in the ISA range.
okay.
Cheers,
Ben.
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
