Hi, On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:56:52PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > > Do you think it's a good idea to let user select binding driver directly > > and the binding driver config depends on chipidea config? > > I don't have a strong opinion on this, although I prefer it the way it > is now, because, imo: > > * in case of =m (and that's the only sane way of compiling it anyway), > these all are compiled as modules, which you simply don't install if > you don't want them; > * all of them get compile-tested every time you change something in > the driver, which is a good thing;
only true for $(ARCH) builds. I would like to see these drivers being compile tested on linux-next on all arches. Thus the patches I just sent. -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
