Hello Randy,

expanding the audience a bit ...

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 04:21:48PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:57:23AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt |    2 +-
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.txt  |    2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt 
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> > index a200695..0c1bccd 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Atmel NAND flash
> >  Required properties:
> >  - compatible : "atmel,at91rm9200-nand".
> >  - reg : should specify localbus address and size used for the chip,
> > -   and if availlable the ECC.
> > +   and if available the ECC.
> >  - atmel,nand-addr-offset : offset for the address latch.
> >  - atmel,nand-cmd-offset : offset for the command latch.
> >  - #address-cells, #size-cells : Must be present if the device has sub-nodes
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.txt 
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.txt
> > index f114ce1..6e1f61f 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.txt
> > @@ -35,4 +35,4 @@ flash@0 {
> >     uimage@100000 {
> >             reg = <0x0100000 0x200000>;
> >     };
> > -];
> > +};
> this patch didn't appear in next yet (looking at next-20120518). Do you
> have concerns? Or do you think someone else should take and/or ack the
> patch?
ping

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to