On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 05:02:05, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * AnilKumar Ch <[email protected]> [120831 02:30]:
> > Adds basic pinctrl device tree data for AM33XX family of devices.
> > This patch is based on the pinctrl-single driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Ch <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi |    9 +++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
> > index be43511..bf5f713 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
> > @@ -40,6 +40,15 @@
> >             };
> >     };
> >  
> > +   am3358_pinmux: pinmux@44e10800 {
> > +           compatible = "pinctrl-single";
> > +           reg = <0x44e10800 0x0238>;
> > +           #address-cells = <1>;
> > +           #size-cells = <0>;
> > +           pinctrl-single,register-width = <32>;
> > +           pinctrl-single,function-mask = <0x7f>;
> > +   };
> > +
> 
> Is this controller the same for all am33xx? If so, please use
> am33xx_pinmux naming. Note that some padconf registers may not
> be listed for all the variants, but the registers may still be
> there for all the variants. So a generic entry is a better
> choice here as otherwise you'l need to include am33xx.dtsi into
> am3358.dtsi.
> 

Controller is same for all am33xx devices, I will spin a patch
by renaming to am33xx_****

Thanks
AnilKumar
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to