On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Lee Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 31 May 2013, Bryan Wu wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Linus Walleij
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > From: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
>> >
>> > Based on pending device tree support in the LP55xx drivers
>> > we can add the correct LED and channel configuration from the
>> > ux500 device tree for all HREF variants.
>> >
>> > Cc: Milo Kim <[email protected]>
>> > Cc: Bryan Wu <[email protected]>
>> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
>> > ---
>> > arch/arm/boot/dts/href.dtsi | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/href.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/href.dtsi
>> > index 62523f6..e315429 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/href.dtsi
>> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/href.dtsi
>> > @@ -63,16 +63,42 @@
>> > };
>> >
>> > i2c@80128000 {
>> > - lp5521@0x33 {
>> > - compatible = "lp5521";
>> > + lp5521@33 {
>>
>> Is this right, I guess it should be still "lp5521@0x33", although it's
>> just a name.
>
> What makes you say that Bryan?
>
> All other nodes drop the '0x', as it's implied.
>
But I still got this in this patch
" bh1780@0x29 {"
which is not changed. So which one should be the right?
-Bryan
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
