On Mon, 03 Jun 2013, Bryan Wu wrote: > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Lee Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 31 May 2013, Bryan Wu wrote: > > > >> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Linus Walleij > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > From: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> > >> > > >> > Based on pending device tree support in the LP55xx drivers > >> > we can add the correct LED and channel configuration from the > >> > ux500 device tree for all HREF variants. > >> > > >> > Cc: Milo Kim <[email protected]> > >> > Cc: Bryan Wu <[email protected]> > >> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> > >> > --- > >> > arch/arm/boot/dts/href.dtsi | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > >> > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/href.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/href.dtsi > >> > index 62523f6..e315429 100644 > >> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/href.dtsi > >> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/href.dtsi > >> > @@ -63,16 +63,42 @@ > >> > }; > >> > > >> > i2c@80128000 { > >> > - lp5521@0x33 { > >> > - compatible = "lp5521"; > >> > + lp5521@33 { > >> > >> Is this right, I guess it should be still "lp5521@0x33", although it's > >> just a name. > > > > What makes you say that Bryan? > > > > All other nodes drop the '0x', as it's implied. > > > > But I still got this in this patch > " bh1780@0x29 {" > > which is not changed. So which one should be the right?
The one without the '0x' is correct. If there are any of these left over that Linus hasn't fixed yet, I'm happy to fix. -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
