On 13.02.2009 01:43, David Gibson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:26:46AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >> I didn't mean to say they are a bad idea for FDTs, just that they're on >> an awkward level of abstraction for QEMU configuration. There, I'd >> rather express a PCI address as "02:01.0" than as <0x00000220>. >> Translating text to binary is the machine's job, not the user's. >> > > Ah, I see what you mean. Hrm, there are several possibilities here, > we'll have to see which works out best for your purposes. >
Using the DTC version included in the coreboot v3 sources would solve that problem and give you a readable PCI address representation. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
