On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 03:11 +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > On 13.02.2009 01:43, David Gibson wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:26:46AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > > >> I didn't mean to say they are a bad idea for FDTs, just that they're on > >> an awkward level of abstraction for QEMU configuration. There, I'd > >> rather express a PCI address as "02:01.0" than as <0x00000220>. > >> Translating text to binary is the machine's job, not the user's. > >> > > > > Ah, I see what you mean. Hrm, there are several possibilities here, > > we'll have to see which works out best for your purposes. > > > > Using the DTC version included in the coreboot v3 sources would solve > that problem and give you a readable PCI address representation.
As would the proposed language enhancements I suggested. jdl _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
