On 13.02.2009 21:04, Jon Loeliger wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 03:11 +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > >> On 13.02.2009 01:43, David Gibson wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:26:46AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I didn't mean to say they are a bad idea for FDTs, just that they're on >>>> an awkward level of abstraction for QEMU configuration. There, I'd >>>> rather express a PCI address as "02:01.0" than as <0x00000220>. >>>> Translating text to binary is the machine's job, not the user's. >>>> >>>> >>> Ah, I see what you mean. Hrm, there are several possibilities here, >>> we'll have to see which works out best for your purposes. >>> >>> >> Using the DTC version included in the coreboot v3 sources would solve >> that problem and give you a readable PCI address representation. >> > > As would the proposed language enhancements I suggested. >
Do you have a pointer to the archives for that? Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
