On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 08:16:02AM -0800, Greg Zartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [..."R&D OpenCare" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...] > > So, all in all , one could choose to use : > > > > logon home = \\%N\%U\.profile > > logon path = \\%N\%U\.profile > > This seems to make good sense to me. I realize we've been around the block > about four times on this, but what do you think Gordon? It's definitely > more logical than what we are currently using as the profiles are stored in > the same locations regardless of the OS.
Also sounds good to me. However, I thought that was what the [Profiles] share was all about for WinNT/2K... The advantage is that everything related to the user is in one hierarchy. The disadvantage is you can't split profiles onto a separate space, but that is not currently supported, and doesn't help in the Win9x case anyway. Do we have a "Don't cross the streams" issue? What if someone moves from Win9x to Win2K - is it safe to use the same profile directory? Gordon -- Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] VP Engineering Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
