On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 05:43:17PM -0400, "Smith, Jeffery S (Scott)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A simple mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" would have been sufficient, > > rather than a mail to over 700 recipients of the list. > > I didn't realize not being able to find the SRPMS was a bug :-) > [...]
Sure. But why include over 700 people when only a few can actually have any effect? Darrell's been on the list a long time, and knows the people at Mitel - there's no need to ask "Mitel" in the abstract, or waste everyone's time with something that only we can actually do. If you would like us to do something, please ask us via [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [...] > I hate to go into the issues of not holding beta dialogs in public. > [...] We hold public betas to expand the testing we can do in-house of certain components of our commercial release. We know the community benefits from these releases, as do we. We've had a set of excellent bug reports on 6.0, and quick turnaround on those fixes. We've asked for a particular method of reporting bugs or issues, as it works for us. We appreciate any and all effort people make to test the betas and report bugs. In return, we hope you like what we release. Thanks, Gordon -- Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Director, Engineering Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com/ -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
