> > So how are you going to do "think cash" in a way that: > > 1. Is not some weak clientside security measure. Puzzle generates target insertion key. > 2. Does not require any Java or Javascript or any other sort of smart > content. See 1 > 3. Does not make freenet-mail even slower. Email recipient knows to look only at puzzle results, makes fmail faster. > 4. Is quite reliable. See 1/3 > 5. A well designed computer program couldn't get past the "think > cash" by knowing either what the questions are and what the > answers should be or doing some simple sort of artificial > intelligence. AI is not all that advanced. Machine vision sucks, so a visual puzzle is the easiest current choice. > 6. Does not require any sort of daemons running on remote machines > (like mailing list software does) or modifications to the Freenet > node. See 1
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Peter Todd
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Chris Anderson
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #3: Stacks Scott G. Miller
PGP signature