On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:29:21PM -0400, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2001, Ian Clarke wrote:
>
> > For those who think that layer #2 should be a front-end to layer #1, all
> > you are doing is adding unnescessary bloat. Any smart implementation of
> > layer #2 will interface directly with the node, and there will be no
> > incentive to use layer #1.
>
> I disagree. Nodes have enough to do already. Layers 2 and 3 should be
> implemented as a separate program, in order to prevent duplication of
> effort and incompatibilities (which will be hell for client writers).
>
> However, you did convince me that layer 3 makes sense. Many applicationsi
You people are yammering about layers.
'
WHERE THE FUCK IS THE DEFINITION OF THESE LAYERS!!!
David Schutt
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
