Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond...

[Brandon]

> Guess I should explain better.
> I am *not* suggesting in any way that FCP should implement FProxy.
> What I *do* mean is that I personally would like it if FCP allowed keys to
> be treated as 'black boxes' with the same simplicity and high-level
> treatment as with FProxy, and the command-line clients.

If you can't come to an agreement on the philosophy of FPC, you might
consider switching to XML-RPC, which has a different design philosophy
closer to the one which you're espousing. I think there's room for
multiple design philosophies such as with Client/SimplifiedClient.



_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl