On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 06:44:21PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 07:10:04PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > You people are yammering about layers. > > ' > > > > WHERE THE FUCK IS THE DEFINITION OF THESE LAYERS!!! > > Layer #1 - FCP as it is currently defined > Layer #2 - Metadata handling built into FCP > Layer #3 - Stacks > > Ian. Thank you. Might I respectfully suggest that 'layer' may be a misleading term for these features. Has the stacks proposal been formally refined since it was originally proposed? David Schutt _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
- [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... Steven Hazel
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... david
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] FCP Layer #2 and beyond... Adam Langley
