David wrote:
> All this aside, I still like the idea of a '.free' underground
> domain, using
> the familiar web paradigm.
> It's tempting to strip all that functionality out of FreeWeb, to appease
> Ian's concerns, and publish the FwProxy as a completely separate program,
> not associated with FreeWeb.
> (Ian, would you be happy with that?)
Why not tag the www. and .free bit on to the actual KSK and leave it
optional.
Wouldn't that make everybody happy? (If you don't mind KSK's that is).
Neil
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Chris Anderson
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Chris Anderson
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Neil Barsema
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments toad
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments David McNab
- RE: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Ian Clarke
- RE: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Ian Clarke
