On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 03:15:16PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > How about I create a separate build of FreeWeb which excludes all the > fwproxy/DNS/KSK functionality, and publish it under a different name, such > as 'WinSite', or 'Winsert'.? Well, I would prefer that you agree with me and drop the www.xxx.free functionality altogether. As I mentioned before, where protocols are concerned, sometimes it is better to deny people options (as when M$ tries to add Windows specific functionality to Java - they argue that they are just giving people options, however the more people that take advantage of those options, the worse it is for the Java platform as a whole). Ian.
- RE: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Blair Strang
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Chris Anderson
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Chris Anderson
- RE: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Neil Barsema
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments toad
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments David McNab
- RE: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Ian Clarke
- RE: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Ian Clarke
PGP signature