On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 02:05:16PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > >> I have not heard a single example of this. If true, then it should be > >> considered, and the MSK protocol may even need to be modified, but it > really > >> doesn't mean that we should convert to your .free protocol. > >> > >Try wget, it screws up the URLs exactly like this. > Also, about half the site-ripper tools listed on the Tucows shareware site > do this as well. > A specific example is one that (was) my favourite - Offline Explorer. If this is true, then we should consider either: a) Contacting the authors of these systems to point out the bug, or b) Modifiying the MSK protocol in a backwards compatable manner which addresses this problem. Ian.
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments thelema
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments George Duarte
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments eigenman
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments toad
- RE: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Blair Strang
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Chris Anderson
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Chris Anderson
- RE: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments Neil Barsema
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freeweb comments toad
PGP signature