On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 01:07:10PM -0500, thelema wrote:
> I'm all for trying out things that could help the network, but I don't
> like jumping in head first. Not to mention I'd imagine lots of people
> aren't going to upgrade to this newest version, leaving us in a
> situation with a mixed node behavior. I guess my response is that we
> should proceed with some caution, as breaking the network isn't a good
> idea.
Well, having mixed node behavior with respect to caching shouldn't
break the network. I agree with your discomfort over jumping in
head-first, although this shouldn't have a cataclysmic effect even if it
doesn't work.
> A very high priority should be getting a solid debian package out, as
> there's _lots_ of people using the old one even with its problems.
> RPMs for the non-debian users would be good as well, so if anyone has
> RPM packaging experience, that'd be a great help.
Agreed, Mr. Bad - could you check your .deb scripts and stuff into CVS
so that others can create .debs, and use them for the basis of an rpm
package? I would refrain from creating a 0.3.9.1 deb given the mapfile
bug, but a 0.3.9.2 deb should follow that release shortly.
Ian.
PGP signature
