On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 09:24:29AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 10:48:10AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 08:44:44PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > I have noticed with recent CVS that FProxy is slow to return pages, and
> > > sometimes it hangs for ages without returning an error message. Now it
> > > may be something todo with my HTL 100, combined with QueryRestarted
> > > messages coming from somewhere. I am getting suspicious that
> > > QueryRestarted messages may not be such a hot idea.
> >
> > And what, may I ask, is the alternative?
>
> No query restarted message, and the message times out within a
> constrained amount of time.
Using a TTL instead of a HTL is an option, but you still need to do
something if you get no reply at all. Terminating the request completely
works, but I don't see the advantage at all.
What you should do is give some warning to the fproxy user when it
happens, so that a user that doesn't want to wait can give up.
> > I tend to think that using HTL 100 and then complaining about slow
> > response is a little silly...
>
> I am not talking about just slow responses, I am talking about 3 hours
> with no response.
The wait time for queryrestarted with HTL 100 should be 20 minutes, so
that is a lot of nodes that are eating your requests.
--
'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?'
'Here,' Montag touched his head.
'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded.
Oskar Sandberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
