On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 05:52:12PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 11:31:20PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
<>
> > Yes, but it doesn't stop one party from having more references than
> > other parties, so it cannot be considered to address honest cancers at
> > all.
>
> You mean network-wide? It certainly does deter one party from having
> more references than another within the same node. And don't you think
> it would therefore be a deterrent, network-wide?
>
> The operator of an honest cancer node would really have to walk a
> tightrope to keep a presence in as many other nodes' routing tables
> as possible, yet without becoming the local ubernode too rapidly.
Tavin, one party can be any number of nodes...
--
'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?'
'Here,' Montag touched his head.
'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded.
Oskar Sandberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
