On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:00:15AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 05:52:12PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 11:31:20PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> <>
> > > Yes, but it doesn't stop one party from having more references than
> > > other parties, so it cannot be considered to address honest cancers at
> > > all.
> >
> > You mean network-wide? It certainly does deter one party from having
> > more references than another within the same node. And don't you think
> > it would therefore be a deterrent, network-wide?
> >
> > The operator of an honest cancer node would really have to walk a
> > tightrope to keep a presence in as many other nodes' routing tables
> > as possible, yet without becoming the local ubernode too rapidly.
>
> Tavin, one party can be any number of nodes...
Yes, yes. I think we have been arguing about slightly different
scenarios here.. fagetaboutit
Well, we can at least make the network safe from script kiddies..
--
# tavin cole
#
# "Technology is a way of organizing the universe so that
# man doesn't have to experience it."
#
# - Max Frisch
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
