Re: [freenet-devl] another solution to ubernodes

[Neil Barsema]

Tavin wrote:
> I think it's computationally infeasible, unless we want to make the
routing
> table suck up ridiculous amounts of memory and processor time.

Perhaps, but the removal of nodes/refernces could run as a low priority
background thread.
like a GC.





_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl