On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 01:03:24PM +0100, Adam Langley wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 04:30:38PM -0700, Scott Miller wrote: > > quote: > > The ciphersuites that would seem to suit your needs are > > SSL_RSA_WITH_NULL_MD5 and SSL_RSA_WITH_NULL_SHA. They use export > > strength RSA for authentication (512 bit), no encryption and either a > > MD5 or an SHA MAC. There are no SSL ciphersuites without a MAC. > > Better yet, be upto date: > TLS_RSA_WITH_NULL_SHA (0x0002) and TLS_RSA_WITH_NULL_MD5 (0x0001). The > PureTLS Java package is pretty well respected. > > However, with SSL/TLS the client offers a list of ciphers and the > server picks one. If the client doesn't offer *_NULL_* then you can't > pick it and I don't know of any browsers which offer this* because > SSLv2 was venerable to a downgrade attack. > > * > Netscape: Nope - and I can't see any option to enable it > Konqueror: Disabled by default, but it can do it > > AGL Well damn. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
- Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and ... David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and ... Theodore Hong
- Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and ... Scott Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and ... Gianni Johansson
- Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and ... Tavin Cole
- RE: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and ... Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy... Theodore Hong
- Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and ... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and ... Theodore Hong
- Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and ... Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and ... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and ... Sebastian Sp�th
- Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and ... Adam Langley
- Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and ... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and ... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and ... Dave Hooper
- RE: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and ... Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and ... Ian Clarke
