Re: [freenet-devl] ok, seriously folks, about fproxy and 0.4

[Adam Langley]

On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 10:31:41AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
> I think that what is needed here is some kind of management interface to
> the node.  This should be password protected (password specificed in
> .fproxyrc and functionality disabled unless it is).  It could support
> multiple connections, and also support the shutdown request
> functionality we have discussed before.  Commands could include:
> 
> List outstanding MessageCallbacks
> Print message log
> Output datastore diagnostics
> Shutdown
> Write datastore
> Print <plugin> log (ie. plugin=fproxy)

Current plans for whiterose are that the FCP interface accepts FNP
encrypted connections and allows extra admin commands to be sent if
the fingerprint is good.

AGL

-- 
Don't believe everything you hear or anything you say.

PGP signature