On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 02:04:13PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > Are you saying that Freenet shouldn't rank with most Windows applications > for user-friendliness? Obviously not. I am saying that Freenet is not an mp3 sharing tool, so our goal should not be to make it look like one. I am *not* saying that we shouldn't try to make Freenet as user friendly as possible, merely that user friendliness does not equate to looking like Napster. > What??!??! > User-friendliness is "not really appropriate for our goals of freedom of > information" ??!? That is not what I said, and clearly - if you consider anything I have said on the issue of user friendliness from day one - not what I think. Ian.
- [freenet-devl] Re: Windows installer and Sun JRE Marc_L_Siegel
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: Windows installer and Sun JRE Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: Windows installer and Sun JRE thelema
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: Windows installer and Sun JRE David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: Windows installer and Sun JRE Scott G. Miller
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: Windows installer and Sun JRE Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: Windows installer and Sun JRE Sebastian Sp�th
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: Windows installer and Sun JRE David McNab
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: Windows installer and Sun JRE Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: Windows installer and Sun JRE Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: Windows installer and Sun JRE Sebastian Sp�th
- Re: [freenet-devl] Re: Windows installer and Sun JRE Sebastian Sp�th
PGP signature