On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 08:17:35PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > > How do you see Frost going in the medium term? I think we need some > > convergence of Frost into Fproxy. > > I disagree, Frost is fine as a separate application. If they want to > include a freenet.jar in their distro, then that would be fine, but it > isn't appropriate for us to include their functionality in the Freenet > platform. Think of us as the Linux Kernel. Frost is welcome to think > of themselves as RedHat, including our jar with their code if they want. > We should take a minimalistic approach towards client functionality in > Freenet - Fproxy is probably stepping over the line here, but I think we > should tolerate one exception.
We should not support KSK-based boards at this point IMHO because they are floodable far too easily, and they don't scale. It is already possible to do numerous illegal things with Fproxy. We include Fproxy for usability reasons. Making Frost and Fproxy talk to each other a little bit would improve the content available via Fproxy significantly. > > Ian. > > -- > Ian Clarke ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] > Latest Project http://locut.us/ > Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ian/ -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] Full time freenet hacker. http://freenetproject.org/ Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at ICTHUS.
msg06556/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
