On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:46:58AM +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> for usability reasons. Making Frost and Fproxy talk to each other a
> little bit would improve the content available via Fproxy significantly.

This whole thing is related to a proposal a while ago for a "3rd layer" 
of FCP which would support functionality for automated insertion and 
retrieval of indexed files, similar to how FMB and Frost do it, but a 
more generic solution.

If we were to go down this path, we should do it right - that means 
first defining this functionality in FCP as a "3rd layer", and then 
thinking about how we will provide a user-interface to this in FProxy.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Clarke                ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com]
Latest Project                                          http://locut.us/
Personal Homepage                                   http://locut.us/ian/

_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to