> Certainly. However there is the key compromize issue, and until we have > resolved this (by implementing revocable SSKs), we are not going to do > anything approaching a project freesite or anything else that requires a > project SSK.
I would perhaps point out that my original SSK proposal would have made this much easier. It actually defined a language which could be used to specify what was entitled to insert into a subspace. The simplest version of this would be "anything that is signed by public key X" which would be the same as today's SSKs. Of course, much more sophisticated criteria could be defined such as "must be signed by a public key that has itself been signed by X" or "must be signed by two of public keys X, Y, or Z" etc. Unfortunately, as usual, few recognised the true genius of my proposal at the time dismissing it as over-complicated, Vincent Van Gogh - I know how you felt ;-) Ian. -- Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ Founder, Locutus http://locut.us/ Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ian/
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
