On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 11:23:31AM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck wrote: > On Friday 04 July 2003 05:29 am, Niklas Bergh wrote: > > > > > NOT ON MY BOX! I have even gone so far as to limit myself to 128 > > > > > connections and my CPU useage is still averaging more than 75% > > > > > useage, and is at 100% a lot! Of course it is Niced so it doesn't > > > > > interfere much, but it DOES suck up LOTS of CPU. (I have > > > > > > a 1.53Ghz > > > > > > > > Athlon under Linux.) My load has been constantly over 90% > > > > > > ever sense > > > > Less connections allowed might actually give your CPU a higher load if > > your node is popular. This is due to it being forced to perform more, > > crypto-heavy, connection negotiations. > > Is there a way to fix this? IE: not respond to every new node that comes > along?
Technically, but it is _REALLY_ bad for load balancing, routing and so on. > > > > so many connections all the time it really slows down my > > > normal internet > > > access. > > > > So many connections open or so many connections beeing established? > > Connections being established, I think. However I am beginning to suspect, > biased on what I'm seeing here that my cable company may be running a packet > shaper to slow the connection of computers that are connecting to lots of > others. > > I have just recently set my total connections back down to 50 and my network > access is much faster. However my CPU useage is still very high. > > > Are negotiations throttled? > > I am using incoming and outgoing bandwidth limiting, and limitting the total > number of connections. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
