On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 08:16:39PM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck spake thusly:
> Ok, why does everyone act as though NGrouting is going to be the Holy Grail. 

Because we are all frustrated that performance has only gotten worse over
the last year and are really really really hoping that things will get
better. We have nothing else to pin our hopes on but NGR.

> So for the time being, will everyone just stop rejecting reasonable ideas 
> simply because "NGrouting is comming". (Although this idea is clearly much 
> more contrivertial than most.) 

What reasonable ideas have been rejected? Most of the ideas proposed
recently that I object to would not be needed if freenet worked properly
and are only a distraction from getting it working properly. NGR is a big
step in the direction of getting it working properly. It has been shown
that freenet performance is all about routing. Without effective routing
we are just another non-scalable broadcast search network that doesn't
find data.

If NGR doesn't work I think something serious is going to have to be
proposed to enforce routing and strong specialization. 

-- 
Tracy Reed      
http://ultraviolet.org

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to