On Monday 04 August 2003 02:42 pm, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:41:45PM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote: > > Hmmm.. Well, fproxy knows the mimetype as specified by the inserter at > > least. That might be quite far from the truth though... > > So? The worst that can happen is that it doesn't compress something > that could be compressed, or tries to compress something that isn't very > compressible. Neither would be the end of the world. > > Of course, I maintain my slight distaste for this whole idea, NGR should > make it largely unnecessary. > > Ian.
Ok, why does everyone act as though NGrouting is going to be the Holy Grail. I've read all the docs etc. But I'm not convinsed that is will be anything more than a minor preformance improvement. (Although I'd love to be wrong.) So for the time being, will everyone just stop rejecting reasonable ideas simply because "NGrouting is comming". (Although this idea is clearly much more contrivertial than most.) _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
