On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:08:18AM -0700, gnutella fan spake thusly: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/32567.html
I don't get it. What's to stop the Iranian govt from blocking access to anonymizer? > Mostly unfettered. Like the Iranian filters, the U.S. service blocks porn > sites -- "There's a limit to what taxpayers should pay for," says Berman. I'm not optimistic about freenet getting this sort of funding. Apparently there is such thing as too much freedom. :) > Cottrell and Berman agree that it's only a matter of time before the > Iranonymity service winds on the official blacklist. But Berman hints that > the U.S. is ready for a prolonged electronic shell game with Tehran. "In Freenet would put an end to this shell game unless they want to stoop to protocol analysis of all tcp traffic on all ports and even then I'm not sure if freenet would be distinguishable from SSL traffic. -- Tracy Reed http://ultraviolet.org
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
