On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 03:53:25PM -0700, Tracy R Reed wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:08:18AM -0700, gnutella fan spake thusly: > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/32567.html > > I don't get it. What's to stop the Iranian govt from blocking access to > anonymizer? > > > Mostly unfettered. Like the Iranian filters, the U.S. service blocks porn > > sites -- "There's a limit to what taxpayers should pay for," says Berman. > > I'm not optimistic about freenet getting this sort of funding. Apparently > there is such thing as too much freedom. :) > > > Cottrell and Berman agree that it's only a matter of time before the > > Iranonymity service winds on the official blacklist. But Berman hints that > > the U.S. is ready for a prolonged electronic shell game with Tehran. "In > > Freenet would put an end to this shell game unless they want to stoop to > protocol analysis of all tcp traffic on all ports and even then I'm not > sure if freenet would be distinguishable from SSL traffic.
That's a nice dream. It's a considerable way from reality even with major funding though. > > -- > Tracy Reed > http://ultraviolet.org -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
